Categories: Journalist

How to Contact Teesta Setalvad: Phone Number, Contact, Whatsapp, Fanmail Address, Email ID, Website

How to contact Teesta Setalvad? Teesta Setalvad’s Contact Address, Email ID, Website, Phone Number, Fanmail Address

Hello friends! Are you a follower of Teesta Setalvad? Are you searching on google for How to contact Teesta Setalvad? What is Teesta Setalvad’s WhatsApp number, contact number, or email ID? What is Teesta Setalvad’s hometown and citizenship address? What is Teesta Setalvad’s Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram ID?

Do you have a question; how do I send a fan mail and autograph request to Teesta Setalvad? Please prepare a nice and well-explained autograph request letter. Don’t forget to use simple language and easy-to-understand sentences for quick understanding.

Find out all these things in our article below…

Today I will tell you about HOW TO CONTACT TEESTA SETALVAD.

Teesta Setalvad is a journalist and activist working for human rights in India. She was born on February 9, 1962. Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) is an organization that was established to fight for those who lost their lives in the riots that took place in Gujarat in 2002. She serves as the organization’s secretary. Setalvad was born in Gujarat in 1962 into a Gujarati family. Her father, Atul Setalvad, is a lawyer in Mumbai, and her mother, Sita Setalvad, is Atul’s wife. Her maternal grandfather was the first Attorney General of India, and her paternal grandfather was M. C. Setalvad.

Javed Anand, a journalist turned campaigner for the rights of minorities, is Setalvad’s husband. They raised a daughter and a boy as their children together. Teesta recalled in a talk she gave in front of an audience at the Press Club in March 2017 that despite coming from a family with a long tradition of working in the legal field, she decided to pursue a career in journalism after reading a book titled “All the President’s men” that her father had purchased for her.

After that, she enrolled in a university, spent her first two years of college studying law, changed her major to philosophy, and eventually became a journalist after graduating from Bombay University with a bachelor’s degree in the subject in 1983. She worked as a reporter for the Mumbai editions of the newspapers The Daily (India) and The Indian Express, as well as for Business India magazine later on. Her first experience with communal violence was covering the riots in Bhiwandi in 1984. These riots occurred in 1984.

Setalvad had a successful career in mainstream journalism that spanned ten years. As a direct reaction to the anti-Muslim and anti-Hindu riots in Mumbai in 1993, she and her husband gave up their usual occupations to launch Communalism Combat, a monthly magazine. According to Javed Anand, who is Setalvad’s husband and a co-founder of Communalism Combat, the reason why they decided to leave mainstream media and create a magazine was that it was also a platform that provided them with the ability to interfere in ways that they otherwise would not have been able to. This was the reasoning behind the choice to break away from conventional journalism.

The magazine’s last print edition was published in November 2012. After then, they entered the realm of digital media by launching a website, which is now defunct since they moved on to digital platforms. On April 1, 2002, Setalvad and her husband co-founded an organization called “Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP),” together with other individuals, including Father Cedric Prakash, who is a Catholic priest; Anil Dharker, who is a journalist; Alyque Padamsee, Javed Akhtar, Vijay Tendulkar, and Rahul Bose, who are all cinema and theater stars; and others.

The non-governmental organization (NGO) immediately initiated legal action in many courts against the alleged cooperation of Gujarat state’s Chief Minister and administration in the riots that had broken out not long before. These disturbances had occurred not long before. Their efforts were partially successful in April 2004, when the Supreme Court of India decided to move the “Best Bakery case” to the state of Maharashtra, which is located nearby.

At the same time, the Court reversed the recent acquittal of 21 accused individuals and ordered that both the investigation and the trial be reexamined and re-conducted. By the end of 2013, all of the cases that CPJ had brought forward had been thrown out at all three levels of the Indian judicial system (the trial court, the state High Court, and the Indian Supreme Court), and just one appeal was now being considered.

Maya Kodnani, who served as a minister in the state government of Gujarat in the past, is appealing her conviction, handed down by the High Court up to the Supreme Court. When Guardians Betray: The Role of the Police is a chapter that Teesta wrote for the book Gujarat: The Making of a Tragedy, published by Penguin and edited by Siddharth Varadarajan, Teesta’s part may be found in the book. The book is about the riots that occurred in Gujarat in 2002.

Teesta Setalvad Phone Number

Communalism Combat is a magazine co-founded and co-edited by Teesta Anand, whose husband, Javed Anand, is also a journal co-founder. The publication promotes communal peace by criticizing organizations that promote sectarian violence. On June 10, 2002, Teesta spoke out against the BJP-led Gujarat government’s role in the sectarian violence after Godhra. Her testimony was presented before the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom.

Teesta began working on the Khoj (Quest) project in 1997. The project aims to revise portions of history and social studies textbooks used in Indian schools to erase “anti-minority prejudices.”Teesta fervently supports women’s rights and equality and the rights of Dalits, Muslims, and other oppressed groups. Javed Anand, Teesta’s spouse, owns and operates Sabrang Communications, a company that advocates for human rights. Teesta has been selected to serve as the organization’s official spokesman.

Teesta is the leader of the non-governmental organization (NGO) Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP), which is located in Mumbai.
She was an original Women in the Media Committee member and helped form it. The organization’s goal is to bring together women who are already working as journalists to discuss problems that are relevant to their jobs and increase awareness of the need for gender sensitivity while writing about and reporting on issues that affect women.

She was jailed by the Anti-Terrorism Squad of the Gujarat Police in June 2022 and remained there until July 1. According to Amnesty International India, the arrest of Mr. Setalvad is a “direct reprisal” against those who advocate for human rights. Residents of both Kolkata and Bangalore took to the streets to voice their disapproval of her detention. On September 1, 2022, the Supreme Court expressed concern that several aspects of the case needed more clarity.

These included not imposing any freesheet was filed when she was in detention for the previous two months, the registration of FIR was filed the day shortly after the Supreme Court rejected Zakia Jafri’s case, the Gujarat High Court allowed a lengthy adjournment. No offenses hinder the Gujarat High Court from providing bail to the defendant. The Gujarat High Court will judge her on her regular bail, but the Supreme Court will release her on temporary bail the next day because she is a woman.

The plea for special leave filed by Zakia Jafri-CJP seeks to bring criminal charges against Narendra Modi, who was the Chief Minister of Gujarat at the time and is now the Prime Minister of India, along with 62 other politicians and government officials because they were involved in the violence that occurred in Gujarat in 2002. In the criminal conspiracy charge, it is said that on February 27, 2002, in the aftermath of the catastrophe in Godhra, the then-chief minister, Mr. Modi, called a conference of top police officers and bureaucrats.

He issued his proclamation, which said that Hindus should be allowed to “give vent to their anger.” There are thirty accusations, all of which are interconnected and interdependent on one another. In response to the petition, on April 27, 2009, the Supreme Court issued an order mandating that the inquiry be carried out by the Special Inquiry Team (SIT) that they had constituted. R. K. Raghavan first established the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to examine nine critical incidents of rioting in Gujarat in 2002.

In May 2010, the SIT handed in a preliminary report. On May 14, 2010, Chairman R. K. Raghavan provided the Supreme Court with his views on the report for the Court’s consideration. In November 2010, a report on further investigations was submitted. In November 2010, the United States Supreme Court selected Raju Ramachandran to serve as an amicus curiae, meaning he would help the Court in this matter. The letter that was filed to the Supreme Court by the amicus curiae was dated January 20th, 2011.

On March 15, 2011, the Supreme Court issued an order directing the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the remarks made by the amicus curiae, to reexamine all of the material that was previously recorded, and to record any further evidence that may be necessary. It was noted that the conclusions made by the chairman of the SIT did not correspond with the results of the investigation conducted by the SIT.

After that, the SIT interrogated more witnesses, documented their testimony, and on April 24, 2011, presented a new report based on further investigation. Shanti Bhushan, the attorney representing Zakia Jafri, said on May 5, 2011, in front of the Supreme Court that the Special Investigative Team (SIT) was engaged in a cover-up activity, and he requested copies of the investigative reports.

The amicus curiae submissions Raju Ramachandran told the Court that he had received a copy of an affidavit submitted by Sanjiv Bhatt claiming he was present at a meeting organized by the chief minister on February 27, 2002, when orders were issued to teach Muslims a lesson. Sanjiv Bhatt claimed in his affidavit that Raju Ramachandran was present at the meeting.”The copies of the report, along with the comments of the chairman, be given to the amicus curiae,” the Supreme Court of the United States ordered.

Who should evaluate them in the context of the evidence, the testimonies of witnesses, and have his independent evaluation of all the evidence submitted for the record? The Court said, “If the amicus curiae, based on the evidence on record, finds that any offense is made out against any person, he shall mention the same in the report.”

Teesta Setalvad Fan Mail address:

Teesta Setalvad
Nirant, Juhu Tara Road,
Juhu, Santacruz West,
Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400049

The amicus curiae submissions Raju Ramachandran has handed in his final report, outlining his findings that there is adequate evidence to put Mr. Modi on trial. After that, the judge instructed the SIT, telling them to hand over the final report and all of the evidence they had gathered to the trial court. In addition, the words of the amici curiae presented to the Court were made available to the SIT.

The SIT did not concur with his decision, and on February 8, 2012, they submitted the closure report. On April 10, 2012, the trial court noted that the Special Inquiry Team (SIT) had not discovered any evidence that could be used to prosecute Modi or any of the senior bureaucrats or police officers, and the Court recommended that the inquiry be terminated.

The judge allowed the complainant, Zakia Jafri, to submit a protest petition against the decision. However, the SIT presented several arguments against handing over all the investigation materials to the petitioner. On February 7, 2013, the Supreme Court ordered the SIT to provide the petitioners with copies of all the reports and investigation papers.

In April of 2013, the SIT opposed the protest petition that had been filed by Zakia Jafri and the CJP against the closing of the SIT and presented a report before a local court stating that “Teesta Setalvad and others have falsified the complaint targeting the chief minister who had never said that go and kill people.”

(1) Full Name: Teesta Atul Setalvad

(2) Nickname: Teesta Setalvad

(3) Born: 9 February 1962 (age 61 years), Mumbai

(4) Father: Atul Setalvad

(5) Mother: Sita Setalvad

(6) Sister: Amili Atul Setalvad

(7) Brother: Not Available

(8) Marital Status: Married

(9) Profession: Journalist, Civil Rights Activist

(10) Birth Sign: Aquarius

(11) Nationality: American

(12) Religion: Zoroastrianism